DUMC Library: Evaluating a HARM article

Validity issues |  Strength of inference | Finding articles


Validity issues

Are the results valid?
    Did experimental and control groups begin the study with a similar prognosis?
  1. Did the investigators demonstrate similarity in all known determinants of outcome? Did they adjust for differences in the analysis?
  2. Were exposed patients equally likely to be identified in the two groups?
  3. Did experimental and control groups retain a similar prognosis after the study started?

  4. Were the outcomes and exposures measured in the same way in the groups being compared?
  5. Was follow-up sufficiently complete?

What are the results?

  1. How strong is the association between exposure and outcome?
  2. How precise is the estimate of risk?

How can I apply the results to my patient care?

  1. Were the study patients similar to the patient in my practice?
  2. Was the duration of follow-up adequate?
  3. What was the magnitude of the risk?
  4. Should I attempt to stop the exposure?


Strength of inference

 Adverse
Outcome
Yes
Adverse
Outcome
No
Exposed Yes ab
Exposed No cd

RCT or Prospective cohort studies:

Case-control studies:

Confounding variable is one whose influence distorts the true relationship between a potential risk factor and the clinical outcome of interest.


Finding articles about harm

PubMed: Ovid:

References:


From: Guyatt, G. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: Essentials of Evidence-based Clinical Practice. AMA Press, 2002 and Sackett, D.L. Evidence-Based Medicine. How to Practice and Teach EBM. Churchill-Livingstone, 2nd edition, 2001 (pocket cards). Top of page


Return to EBM Tool Kit
Medical Center Library
Duke University
Last modified on: 16-Dec-04