DUMC Library: Evaluating a HARM article
Validity issues |
Strength of inference | Finding articles
Validity issues
Are the results valid?
Did experimental and control groups begin the study with a similar prognosis?
- Did the investigators demonstrate similarity in all known
determinants of outcome? Did they adjust for differences in the analysis?
- Were exposed patients equally likely to be identified in the two
groups?
Did experimental and control groups retain a similar prognosis after the study started?
- Were the outcomes and exposures measured in the same way in the groups being compared?
- Was follow-up sufficiently complete?
What are the results?
- How strong is the association between exposure and outcome?
- How precise is the estimate of risk?
How can I apply the results to my patient care?
- Were the study patients similar to the patient in my practice?
- Was the duration of follow-up adequate?
- What was the magnitude of the risk?
- Should I attempt to stop the exposure?
Strength of inference
| | Adverse Outcome Yes | Adverse Outcome No |
| Exposed Yes | a | b |
| Exposed No | c | d |
RCT or Prospective cohort studies:
- Relative Risk (RR) is the risk of the outcome in the exposed group divided by the risk of the
outcome in the unexposed group:
RR = a/(a + b) divided by c/(c + d)
"RR of 3.0 means that the outcome occurs 3 times more often in those exposed versus unexposed."
Case-control studies:
- Odds Ratio (OR) is the odds of previous exposure in subjects with the outcome
divided by the odds of exposure in subjects without the outcome:
OR = (a/b) divided by (c/d) = ad/bc
"OR of 3.0 means that cases were 3 times more likely to have been exposed than were control patients."
Confounding variable is one whose influence distorts the true relationship between a potential
risk factor and the clinical outcome of interest.
Finding articles about harm
PubMed:
- Use Clinical Queries for Etiology
- Search term: risk
Ovid:
- risk.mp. (MeSH or textword)
- explode Cohort Studies/ (MeSH)
- EBM Filter under Saved Searches: EBMET1 (comprehensive/sensitivity)
- EBM Filter under Saved Searches: EBMET2 (relevance/specificity)
References:
- JAMA 1994 271:1615-1619
- ACP Journal Club 1994 Nov-Dec; A10-A11
From: Guyatt, G. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: Essentials of Evidence-based Clinical Practice.
AMA Press, 2002 and Sackett, D.L. Evidence-Based Medicine. How to Practice and Teach EBM. Churchill-Livingstone,
2nd edition, 2001 (pocket cards).
Top of page
Return to EBM Tool Kit
Medical Center Library
Duke University
Last modified on: 16-Dec-04